Farmers in many states, including Punjab and Haryana, have been protesting against these bills. The government has already brought ordinances, and the bills seek parliamentary nod for them. Amar Singh (Congress) called it anti-farmers and anti-poor. Trinamool Congress‘ Saugata Roy and Kalyan Banerjee also opposed the bill and accused the Centre of taking away the power of the states. “I don’t understand what was the hurry of bringing the ordinance,” Roy said, and claimed the legislation will benefit big traders, while the farmers would be left in the lurch. “It will give big corporates entry into the space of farmers,” the TMC leader said.
D M Kathir Anand of the DMK also opposed the bill, while Kaushalendra Kumar of the JD(U) supported it, saying the proposed legislation will benefit farmers as they won’t have to sell their agriculture produce at lower prices. P P Chaudhary (BJP) said the legislation will not only benefit farmers but also consumers and described it as a visionary step and the biggest reform in the agriculture sector. Sanjeev Kumar Singari of the YSRCP welcomed the bill, saying farmers need better prices for their agriculture produce. Bhartruhari Mahtab (BJD) was of the view that state interference in every stage is not a smart idea.
“Agriculture markets are over-regulated by outdated laws. India has now become surplus in most agriculture commodities but still there is very less investment in cold storage facilities,” Mahtab said. The government has to safeguard the interest of farmers, he noted. Mahtab also suggested that the government do away with export restrictions in the agriculture sector. Kunwar Danish Ali (BSP) termed the bill as anti-farmers, and said it will benefit the middle man. He alleged that the Modi government wants to privatise PSUs to benefit big industrialists. “This bill is intended to give licence to hoarders,” he alleged.